2016 vs. 2017 Ford Escape: What Changed
The 2017 Ford Escape has several substantial changes in the specifications and ratings we track compared with 2016.
EPA lists a 1.5-litre four-cylinder for 2017 that does not appear in the 2016 listing.
The 1.6-litre four-cylinder is listed for 2016 but not for 2017.
NHTSA's overall rating goes from 4 stars in 2016 to 5 stars in 2017.
The best combined rating for the 2.0-litre four-cylinder rises from 24 to 25 mpg.
Two campaigns cover both years. Two campaigns (air bags and back over prevention) cover the 2016 and not the 2017, while two campaigns (visibility) cover the 2017 and not the 2016.
Fewer campaigns do not establish better reliability. Confirm each car's coverage and repair status by VIN.
The campaigns that separate them
Imported NHTSA recall campaigns that name one of these two model years but not the other, with their component labels. Campaigns covering both years are left out of this list.
Only the 2016
- 17V398000 air bags
- 25V695000 back over prevention
Only the 2017
- 16V617000 visibility
- 26V374000 visibility
Side by side
| 2016 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|
| Engines listed | 1.6L 4-cyl, 2.0L 4-cyl, 2.5L 4-cyl | 1.5L 4-cyl, 2.0L 4-cyl, 2.5L 4-cyl |
| Drive types | All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive | All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive |
| Fuel types | Regular Gasoline | Regular Gasoline |
| Combined MPG | 23–26 | 23–26 |
| Recall campaigns | 4 | 4 |
| Complaints on file | 1109 | 2669 |
| Investigations | 0 | 0 |
What owners reported, by system
2016
2017
Full reports
Open each year's report to read the recall, investigation, manufacturer communication and EPA variant records on file:
Sources and methodology
- Recalls, complaints and investigations: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
- Engines, transmissions, drive types and fuel economy: FuelEconomy.gov (EPA/DOE). Differences between listed configurations do not by themselves establish a redesign.
- See our methodology and data sources pages for how this comparison is built and its limitations.