2017 vs. 2018 Ford Escape: What Changed
Our records for the 2017 and 2018 Ford Escape show one difference in the specifications and ratings tracked below.
The best combined rating for the 2.0-litre four-cylinder falls from 25 to 24 mpg.
Two campaigns cover both years. Two campaigns (visibility) cover the 2017 and not the 2018, while two campaigns (air bags and service brakes) cover the 2018 and not the 2017.
Fewer campaigns do not establish better reliability. Confirm each car's coverage and repair status by VIN.
The campaigns that separate them
Imported NHTSA recall campaigns that name one of these two model years but not the other, with their component labels. Campaigns covering both years are left out of this list.
Only the 2017
- 16V617000 visibility
- 26V374000 visibility
Only the 2018
- 17V803000 air bags
- 18V104000 service brakes
Side by side
| 2017 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|
| Engines listed | 1.5L 4-cyl, 2.0L 4-cyl, 2.5L 4-cyl | 1.5L 4-cyl, 2.0L 4-cyl, 2.5L 4-cyl |
| Drive types | All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive | All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive |
| Fuel types | Regular Gasoline | Regular Gasoline |
| Combined MPG | 23–26 | 23–26 |
| Recall campaigns | 4 | 4 |
| Complaints on file | 2669 | 1783 |
| Investigations | 0 | 0 |
What owners reported, by system
2017
2018
Full reports
Open each year's report to read the recall, investigation, manufacturer communication and EPA variant records on file:
Sources and methodology
- Recalls, complaints and investigations: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
- Engines, transmissions, drive types and fuel economy: FuelEconomy.gov (EPA/DOE). Differences between listed configurations do not by themselves establish a redesign.
- See our methodology and data sources pages for how this comparison is built and its limitations.