2016 vs. 2017 Ford F-150: What Changed
Our records for the 2016 and 2017 Ford F-150 show 3 differences in the specifications and ratings tracked below.
A 10-speed automatic appears for 2017.
The best combined rating for the 2.7-litre six-cylinder rises from 21 to 22 mpg.
The best combined rating for the 3.5-litre six-cylinder rises from 20 to 21 mpg.
Ten campaigns cover both years. Four campaigns (air bags, engine and seats) cover the 2016 and not the 2017, while eight campaigns (air bags, electrical system, power train and others) cover the 2017 and not the 2016.
Fewer campaigns do not establish better reliability. Confirm each car's coverage and repair status by VIN.
The campaigns that separate them
Imported NHTSA recall campaigns that name one of these two model years but not the other, with their component labels. Campaigns covering both years are left out of this list.
Only the 2016
- 16V110000 air bags
- 16V475000 seats
- 17V767000 seats
- 20V098000 engine
Only the 2017
- 17V053000 power train
- 17V332000 seats
- 17V529000 air bags
- 17V599000 seats
- 17V671000 power train
- 18V213000 power train
- 25V236000 service brakes
- 26V370000 electrical system
Side by side
| 2016 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|
| Engines listed | 2.7L V6, 3.5L V6, 5.0L V8 | 2.7L V6, 3.5L V6, 5.0L V8 |
| Drive types | Rear-Wheel Drive, Part-time 4-Wheel Drive | Rear-Wheel Drive, Part-time 4-Wheel Drive |
| Fuel types | Regular Gasoline | Regular Gasoline |
| Combined MPG | 16–21 | 16–22 |
| Recall campaigns | 14 | 18 |
| Complaints on file | 1743 | 1116 |
| Investigations | 4 | 3 |
What owners reported, by system
2016
2017
Full reports
Open each year's report to read the recall, investigation, manufacturer communication and EPA variant records on file:
Sources and methodology
- Recalls, complaints and investigations: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
- Engines, transmissions, drive types and fuel economy: FuelEconomy.gov (EPA/DOE). Differences between listed configurations do not by themselves establish a redesign.
- See our methodology and data sources pages for how this comparison is built and its limitations.