2016 vs. 2017 Honda Civic: What Changed
Our records for the 2016 and 2017 Honda Civic show one difference in the specifications and ratings tracked below.
The best combined rating for the 1.5-litre four-cylinder rises from 35 to 36 mpg.
Two campaigns cover both years. Three campaigns (engine and engine cooling, exterior lighting and parking brake) cover the 2016 and not the 2017, while four campaigns (air bags, equipment, power train and others) cover the 2017 and not the 2016.
Fewer campaigns do not establish better reliability. Confirm each car's coverage and repair status by VIN.
The campaigns that separate them
Imported NHTSA recall campaigns that name one of these two model years but not the other, with their component labels. Campaigns covering both years are left out of this list.
Only the 2016
- 16V074000 engine and engine cooling
- 16V526000 exterior lighting
- 16V725000 parking brake
Only the 2017
- 17V706000 power train
- 18V266000 air bags
- 18V663000 steering
- 18V817000 equipment
Side by side
| 2016 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|
| Engines listed | 1.5L 4-cyl, 2.0L 4-cyl | 1.5L 4-cyl, 2.0L 4-cyl |
| Drive types | Front-Wheel Drive | Front-Wheel Drive |
| Fuel types | Regular Gasoline | Regular Gasoline, Premium Gasoline |
| Combined MPG | 30–35 | 25–36 |
| Recall campaigns | 5 | 6 |
| Complaints on file | 1081 | 596 |
| Investigations | 0 | 0 |
What owners reported, by system
2016
2017
Full reports
Open each year's report to read the recall, investigation, manufacturer communication and EPA variant records on file:
Sources and methodology
- Recalls, complaints and investigations: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
- Engines, transmissions, drive types and fuel economy: FuelEconomy.gov (EPA/DOE). Differences between listed configurations do not by themselves establish a redesign.
- See our methodology and data sources pages for how this comparison is built and its limitations.