2016 vs. 2017 Mazda CX-5: What Changed
Our records for the 2016 and 2017 Mazda CX-5 show 4 differences in the specifications and ratings tracked below.
The 2.0-litre four-cylinder is listed for 2016 but not for 2017.
The 6-speed manual listed for 2016 is not in the 2017 listing.
The best combined rating for the 2.5-litre four-cylinder falls from 29 to 27 mpg.
NHTSA's frontal crash rating goes from 4 stars in 2016 to 5 stars in 2017.
Five campaigns (exterior lighting, fuel system, steering and others) cover the 2016 and not the 2017, while one campaign (trailer hitches) covers the 2017 and not the 2016.
Fewer campaigns do not establish better reliability. Confirm each car's coverage and repair status by VIN.
The campaigns that separate them
Imported NHTSA recall campaigns that name one of these two model years but not the other, with their component labels. Campaigns covering both years are left out of this list.
Only the 2016
- 16E002000 visibility
- 16V064000 fuel system
- 16V203000 steering
- 16V644000 structure
- 20V063000 exterior lighting
Only the 2017
- 17V744000 trailer hitches
Side by side
| 2016 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|
| Engines listed | 2.0L 4-cyl, 2.5L 4-cyl | 2.5L 4-cyl |
| Drive types | Front-Wheel Drive, 4-Wheel Drive | Front-Wheel Drive, 4-Wheel Drive |
| Fuel types | Regular Gasoline | Regular Gasoline |
| Combined MPG | 26–29 | 26–27 |
| Recall campaigns | 5 | 1 |
| Complaints on file | 510 | 148 |
| Investigations | 0 | 0 |
What owners reported, by system
2016
2017
Full reports
Open each year's report to read the recall, investigation, manufacturer communication and EPA variant records on file:
Sources and methodology
- Recalls, complaints and investigations: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
- Engines, transmissions, drive types and fuel economy: FuelEconomy.gov (EPA/DOE). Differences between listed configurations do not by themselves establish a redesign.
- See our methodology and data sources pages for how this comparison is built and its limitations.